The Lover-Marguerite Duras

In this novel, I encountered a similarly intense sensation as with “Combray,” though it left me somewhat puzzled. It doesn’t follow a linear narrative; instead, it intertwines various times and spaces. For instance, in the first forty pages or so, it doesn’t progress the plot but delves into the scenery along the Mekong River. It is evident that the narrative is not structured in chronological order. It interweaves Ana María’s return to France and her life until old age, incorporating thoughts and viewpoints spanning many years. Some events are presented from the perspective of the moment, while others are recounted by future generations recalling those experiences. The narrative perspective shifts, making the reading experience quite intriguing.

For such novels, I believe their distinctive feature lies in allowing each reader to choose their preferred perspective and interpret the work based on their strengths and inclinations. I will briefly discuss the use of the first and third person in the narration, focusing on what resonated most with me.

While the story may seem relatively simple, and the content not exceptionally rich, upon closer examination, numerous themes emerge, addressing love, physical death, survival, poverty, wealth, strength, and weakness.

The novel explores many contrasts. For instance, if a white person and a yellow person fall in love, they may face ridicule. However, young girl is also extremely impoverished, while the Chinese man is incredibly wealthy. Thus, not only is there a racial contrast, but also an economic one, creating another intense juxtaposition. Even the Chinese man himself is full of contradictions. On one hand, he inherits a vast fortune from his father, granting him considerable dominance in terms of wealth. On the other hand, since this money isn’t truly his, he lacks a voice in his own family. Consequently, he remains a weak figure in his own right.

I also conducted some research and learned that this book is not written in a diary format or a real-time emotional account. Instead, Duras, at the age of seventy, recalls a distant love affair prompted by a phone call. The details of this love affair are already blurry in her memory, and she revisits it, narrates it, and bears witness to it, perhaps seeking closure or simply commemorating it. However, she cannot fully recreate the mindset of her youth. Therefore, whether her love existed, its intensity, purity, or impurity, is open to interpretation.

I appreciate Duras’s deliberate use of emotional gaps in the book. She exercises restraint, leaving emotions veiled and requiring readers to interpret them for themselves. For instance, the profound love and resentment towards the mother, the deep love and gratitude towards the Chinese man – these emotions are profound and left for readers to discern. In summary, I would describe this book as “feeling like a poetic film, leaving ample room for imagination while leaving a strong impression.”

My question is that “How does the non-linear narrative structure impact your engagement with the story? Does it enhance or complicate your understanding of Ana María’s life?

1. 

   Anonymous

   2024年3月11日

   Lucy, as a reminder Ana Maria is the name of a previous main character (Bomba’s Shrouded Woman). The main character of this book is unnamed! Also, the events are only told by one narrator and not future generations! I know it can be confusing since it shifts from frist to third person voice. It is always the same narrator (arguably) but from different points in time like you accurately mentioned. 

   Thanks for your comment!

   • Tesi

   LikeLike

   Reply

class, contrast, love, relationship, Women